The MCU is known for its stellar casting but there were a few mishaps where the casting didn’t work out. The biggest one of these casting changes definitely came in the case of Bruce Banner/ The Hulk. The Hulk was first portrayed by Edward Norton in The Incredible Hulk before being played by Mark Ruffalo in the MCU.

The swap isn’t an issue for most people but fans sometimes like to explain away these kind of gaps in their own way. As such, one Redditor had an interesting theory about Banner’s change in appearance from The Incredible Hulk to Avengers. bu the question is- does this explanation hold?

Bruce Banner Looks Like Mark Ruffalo Due To A Suicide Attempt

A suicide attempt might have the answers to the actor changes for Hulk. Pic courtesy: nydailynews.com
A suicide attempt might have the answers to the actor changes for Hulk. Pic courtesy: nydailynews.com

In Avengers, Banner remarked that he tried to commit suicide. He states that he put a bullet in his mouth, but “the other guy spit it out.

The reason this line is important is because there’s a deleted scene in The Incredible Hulk where the same suicide attempt is carried out. In the deleted scene, Banner finds himself somewhere in the Arctic, atop a massive glacier. He pulls out a revolver and pulls back the hammer of the gun. But just before he is able to commit the tragic act, he transforms into Hulk. Enraged, Hulk crushes the gun and then the scene cuts to the glacier breaking apart as Hulk lets out a roar.

The fan theory states that the shot to Banner’s mouth basically restructured his entire face. When Banner transformed into Hulk, the change caused all wounds to heal but they did so in a manner that made Bruce’s face resemble Mark Ruffalo’s rather than Edward Norton’s.

The Bruce Banner Looks Like Mark Ruffalo Theory Has Some Holes

A face change doesn't explain a change in the rest of the physical features of Banner. Pic courtesy: Yahoo.com
A face change doesn’t explain a change in the rest of the physical features of Banner. Pic courtesy: Yahoo.com

There are a few counts on which this theory fails. First of all, this deleted scene was meant to be an alternate opening to The Incredible Hulk. As such, it doesn’t take place between that film and Avengers. In fact it’s before both of them. So, if the change was legitimate, it would have been Ruffalo portraying Banner in The Incredible Hulk rather than Norton.

Mark Ruffalo and Edward Norton also look nothing alike. They have different physiques overall. Norton is leaner than Ruffalo and Ruffalo’s complexion is also pretty noticeably deeper than Norton’s, A gunshot to the head doesn’t explain the rest of the physical changes.

While this theory is interesting to contemplate, but there are some elements in it which doesn’t work. It’s ultimately another pointless effort to explain a change in actors. It’s way better to go the other way round and rework the canon by placing the new actor in the old one’s spot. Just imagine that Banner always looked by Mark Ruffalo and that the Edward Norton version doesn’t necessarily exist. The same kind of dilemma also pops up with War Machine/ Rhodey and Howard Stark.

Of course this doesn’t mean that Norton shouldn’t get credit for The Incredible Hulk. He gives a great performance, given what he had to work with. But Mark Ruffalo owns the role of Hulk now and will continue to do so till the character’s time properly comes to an end.

If you want to know why Edward Norton didn’t play The Hulk in the MCU then click on the video below:

(Source: cbr.com and screenrant.com)

Facebook comments:

Leave a Reply

Adcodes and Instructions provided for: animatedtimes.com ============================================== animatedtimes.com ============================================== ======================================== SID 15564 EDGE_Animatedtimes.com ======================================== PLACE THIS CODE BEFORE THE TAG Edge Ad Code: EDGE_Animatedtimes.com ======================================== ======================================== ***EDGE Trafficking Instructions:*** ======================================== EDGE ad code should be placed directly on the site within the body at the end of the page. The default EDGE configuration is described below. If you have requested a custom configuration, please disregard default settings below. EDGE can be trafficked through ad servers via javascript tags, 1x1 javascript pixel, or DFP/GPT synchronous tag. In DFP, make sure that SafeFrame is disabled (it is automatically enabled by default), otherwise the tags will not work properly. For DFP/GPT, see this link to "Traffic and serve out-of-page creatives": https://support.google.com/dfp_premium/answer/1154352?hl=en ======================================== ======================================== ***EDGE Default Configuration:*** ======================================== SLIDER - Rails w/ Content Detect and Footer w/ Ad Detect: - Serve rail placements (160x600, 300x250 and 300x600) for Desktop when open space is available. All sizes are located at the bottom of the window by default. - When rail space is not available, serve 728x90 or 970x90 footer. With Ad Detect enabled for desktop footers, a 728x90 or 970x90 will not be served when it covers a standard IAB format (728x90, 300x250, 160x600, and/or 300x600). ======================================== ======================================== ***EDGE Default Settings:*** ======================================== - Device Targeting: Desktop, Tablet, and Mobile Phone - 100/24 Frequency cap - Minimum Time between EDGE sliders: 3 seconds is the minimum time allowed; may be increased ========================================